Skjellifetti

Loading...
Symbols:
Authors:
comments58
  • Positive ratings 0
  • Negative ratings 0
  • Net rating 0
Filter comments by:
Highest rated Latest comments
Or filter by symbol:

Latest Comments
58 Comments

    • Fri Oct 17th 12:56 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      IBM: Lessons from the Great Depression
      Next time you are in Washington, D.C., check out the SeaCatch restaurant in Georgetown along the C. and O. canal. The food is reasonably priced and reasonably good, but its fame for IBM affectionados is that the building where it is located was the factory where Herman Hollerith built the punch card tabulators for the 1890 census.

      www.seacatchrestaurant...
      View article »
    • Thu Aug 21st 12:45 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Interview with Jim Rogers, Part I: Bigger Financial Shocks Loom
      chux08: Call him what you will, the smart ones listen <b>with a critical ear</b> to what he has to say.

      There, fixed that for ya!
      View article »
    • Fri Aug 15th 16:04 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      The Great Consumer Crash of 2009
      The author needs to learn the difference between average and median and when it is appropriate to use one vs the other. When Bill Gates builds a house, the average house price looks way out of reach.

      For an alternative take on CC debt, see:

      articles.moneycentral....
      View article »
    • Tue Aug 5th 10:56 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Checking In on the All-ETF Portfolio
      From your Feb article [my substitution]:

      If we have [$BLACK_SWAN], the short-term losses to any portfolio are likely to be far greater than Quantext Portfolio Planner or any other portfolio model can estimate. This kind of massive disruptive event is not what these models are capable of estimating.

      ...

      Ultimately, portfolio models are perhaps most useful because they give investors objective tools to:

      1. examine diversification benefits in their portfolios
      2. estimate total portfolio risk (albeit not very well for market crashes, wars, epidemics, etc.)
      3. estimate total portfolio returns in light of assumptions

      It is point number two that I was trying to highlight. MPT is all about creating portfolios with the best return for a given amount of risk. But if we are doing a poor job of estimating risk, then it is not at all clear that we are, in fact, maximizing expected returns per unit of risk. Tools such as QPP may thus be giving us a false sense of security when they recommend, say, a concentrated position in Malaysia over a larger more diversified basket of emerging market stocks.
      View article »
    • Mon Aug 4th 17:04 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Checking In on the All-ETF Portfolio
      This may also show the limits of using MPT for divining the best risk-adjusted allocations. You have 5% devoted to Malaysia. But in 1998, during the Asian crisis, Malaysia, IIRC, put strict limits on the repatriation of international investments. That would have meant that 5% of your portfolio was suddenly unavailable. How does a tool like QPP account for this kind of risk (or is this uncertainty)?

      I'm not a big fan of Nassim Taleb. He is a terrible writer who is guilty of some egregious rhetorical fallacies. But his main point, that MPT has a terrible time coping with the unknown and that it is this kind of uncertainty that is the biggest source of investment losses, is spot on. That QPP would include Malaysia in a hypothetical best risk-adjusted portfolio is a good example of Taleb's point.
      View article »
    • Mon Aug 4th 13:04 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Delusions of Debt
      Please explain to me how you can meaningfully compare the purchasing power of a 1914 dollar with a 2008 dollar when 90% of the things that are sold in the market today did not exist in 1914.

      IIRC, one of the Rothschild's died in the 1800s from an infection that we would cure today with $4.00 worth of antibiotics. All of his gold couldn't save him. I'll happily take today's goods and prices over the goods and prices of 1914 any day!
      View article »
    • Fri Aug 1st 17:16 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Spotlight on Open Source: Citrix Systems, Red Hat
      Red Hat is very well known in the Open Source community. But during a quick visit to their web site, I didn't see any Open Source products that Citrix Systems offers.
      View article »
    • Wed Jul 16th 13:27 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Investing in Currency ETFs: Irony of the 'Bail-Out' Mentality
      No need to jump to conspiracy theory explanations. The congres... looks like a simple bug in the Seeking Alpha codebase. I suspect that it is trying to treat any set of characters that contains a "/" as part of a URL and simply chopping off the display of the extra characters which would not matter if the the string really was the text displayed in an html anchor tag. Look at morgan77's post where the link text becomes /ec... for an example.
      View article »
    • Tue Jul 15th 15:08 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Bernanke Testimony: Dove With Gloves Off
      The Left constantly criticizes the Bushies/Right wing (for good reason!) for ignoring science and making policy choices that ignore evidence even when that evidence is overwhelming.

      But the Left is just as guilty in their own way. There is no evidence that speculation has caused the price of oil to skyrocket while there is plenty of evidence that good ol' supply and demand are wrecking most of the havoc. One fact that ought to wake up the "its those evil speculators" crowd is that it is the Left wing economists like Paul Krugman who have been poking the most serious holes in their argument. But, hey, just exactly like the Right, the Left will ignore the evidence when it doesn't fit their carefully crafted internal reality.
      View article »
    • Thu Jul 10th 14:20 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Bonds: No Inflation Threat in Sight
      The argument that rates are low and thus don't reflect inflation because there has been a "flight to safety" seems fishy. If you expect your "safe" investment to be eaten up by inflation, then it isn't really "safe", is it?
      View article »
    • Thu Jul 3rd 16:29 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Judge Protects YouTube’s Source Code, Throws Users To The Wolves
      The US is in desperate need the kind of privacy protections that are in place in the EU. It really pisses me off when I call up the gas or cable company and they demand that I give them my SSN and mother's maiden name in order to talk to, say, a billing rep. Private enterprise collects way too much info on their customers and has no problem sharing that info with whoever they choose irrespective of whether their customers want them to share that info. We have a few select laws like HIPAA but most have no teeth like the financial privacy laws that allow your bank to share your data with their marketing affiliates who can then share it with whoever they please.
      View article »
    • Wed Jul 2nd 12:56 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Two Moves to Make as the Fed Inflates the Commodities Bubble
      "It’s fairly clear to me that concerted speculation by hedge funds and pension funds is what’s been pushing up oil prices."

      Then perhaps you would be kind enough to explain the mechanism that is making this happen. If there is a bubble, this implies that current supply is greater than current demand at the current spot price and therefore someone must be buying and storing the excess supply. Show me who is buying the excess supply and where they are storing it.

      On the other side of the coin, there are a number of factors that have reduced the supplies of many commodities (problems in the Nigerian oilfields, lack of investment in Venezuelan and Mexican fields, power shortages in Chile and South Africa, etc.). At the same time, demand is not falling.

      Commodity prices are not being driven by speculators. Simple supply and demand is fully capable of explaining the current high prices. Claims that speculators are driving the prices is a classic example of a wishful thinking logical fallacy. Gosh, if we could just make those evil speculators go away, we could be back in 25 cents per gallon heaven just like in my youth. Better learn to deal with reality, because high prices are going to be around until we can develop alternatives.
      View article »
    • Mon Jun 30th 15:43 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Spanish Inflation, Retail Sales and Bank Lending
      NOBODY expects the Spanish Inflation! Our chief weapon is surprise...surprise and fear...fear and surprise.... Our two weapons are fear and surprise...and monetary growth.... Our *three* weapons are fear, surprise, and monetary growth...and an almost fanatical devotion to oil speculation.... Our *four*...no... *Amongst* our weapons.... Amongst our weaponry...are such elements as fear, surprise....
      View article »
    • Mon Jun 23rd 17:35 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Adventures in Technical Analysis, Jim Cramer Edition
      "Charts are great for predicting the past." -- Peter Lynch

      "I realized technical analysis didn't work when I turned the charts upside down and didn't get a different answer" -- Warren Buffett

      "If past history was all there was to the game, the richest people would be librarians." -- Warren Buffett

      Zack Bass, however, is correct that Salmon's argument is a rhetorical fallacy (as is my own appeal to authority argument above). The real question is to ask if there are any definitive studies that show that technical analysis is predictive of the future and not just the past.
      View article »
    • Mon Jun 23rd 13:37 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Election 2008: Obamanomics and Its Achilles' Heel
      Alphameister,

      You sound like the modern Bush Republican who really doesn't believe in Democracy when the policy outcome isn't what you think it should be. It seems you further pretend to like rational discourse in one breath while mouthing unsubstantiated smears against those with whom you disagree in a second breath. You are exactly the type that the rest of us are so revolted by after 8 years of ideologically driven politics that has utterly failed to solve a single damn problem and created many, many more of its own. There is a reasonable chance that Obama will be elected in a landslide. Better learn to deal with it.
      View article »