Global Warming Examiner

Loading...
Symbols:
Authors:
comments41
  • Positive ratings 0
  • Negative ratings 0
  • Net rating 0
Filter comments by:
Highest rated Latest comments
Or filter by symbol:

Latest Comments
41 Comments

    • Tue Sep 2nd 14:39 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Solar Breaks Oil Price Dependence
      The price of oil should not directly affect the demand for solar cells. Solar creates electricity while oil is used for transportation. Solar will be more affected by the ability of utilities to burn more coal, cost of natural gas (alternative to solar assuming you can't burn coal), price and availability of wind power.
      Tax credits for solar power are currently the biggest factor in demand. Due to governments indecisive nature on future credits, solar stocks can have very large price swings as expectations change with political fortune. US government will be deciding on extending credits that expire the end of this year.
      View article »
    • Fri Aug 29th 18:23 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      BHP Billiton: Painting a Happy Face on Iron Ore
      Should a country that is importing a lot of the raw materials to make steel also be a major exporter? Their tax structure provides incentives to exporters. If only the US would understand that the mandates and other taxes applied to our steel industry make us less competitive with China.
      View article »
    • Thu Aug 21st 14:48 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      How You Can Invest in the Pickens Plan
      The key to Pickens' plan is what our nation does with coal. If we continue to build coal-fired power plants (with all the carbon emissions) then the lower cost of electricity will not support the building of wind farms. If we restrict or prohibit new coal-fired power plants then long term marginal electric costs will be based on the cost of natural gas-fired power plants. In this scenario, wind power is cost effective and will displace natural gas as Pickens envisions. That will free up natural gas for other uses like displacing more expensive petroleum to power our automobiles.

      I don't believe many more coal-fired plants will be built because environmentalists have been successful in challenging them on economic grounds:
      Global Warming will cause restrictions on future carbon emissions so coal plant operators may not be able to recover their capital costs over the long operating life of these plants. If built the shareholders will loose money because the public utility commissions that regulate these plants will not allow the cost to be passed to the consumers and without that guarantee the utility companies will not build the plants.

      Natural Gas fired electric production costs have now become the base cost for electric production in this country.

      (Clean coal has too much carbon emissions and sequestering coal plant emissions has not be shown to work yet and may never work at an acceptable cost for large scale plants.)
      View article »
    • Wed Aug 13th 17:29 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      While Natural Gas Production Increases, Company Stock Prices May Not
      One way to lower carbon dioxide emissions and clean up our air is to substitute natural gas for coal. Coal has almost twice the carbon emissions for the same amount of electricity produced as natural gas, not even counting the releases of mercury and other toxic byproducts from burning coal. Substituting natural gas for coal would be an intermediate step in reducing carbon emissions and give us time to develop more 'perfect' renewable resources like wind and solar. All the government has to do is prohibit the construction of new coal plants and start restricting emissions from existing plants.
      View article »
    • Wed Aug 6th 16:56 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      What the Fed's Latest Decision Means for Investors
      The economy is slow and inflation seems to be under control because bank lending is contracting due to their loan problems. When they have less money to lend, credit in the economy contracts. The Fed is doing everything it can to increase liquidity and get credit expanding again. They can print as much money as they need to fix the banks problems.

      It really is a matter of timing. After the banks start expanding loans again, all this liquidity will cause an excessive amount of credit which will fire up inflation. It will be more difficult for the Fed to remove this excess liquidity once it is out in the economy without very high interest rates, reserve requirements. This excess liquidity being pumped into the economy now will be the fuel for future inflation, although it may be slow to show up because banks have not yet started to expand credit. It will eventually show up, by definition just when the bank credit problems look like they are getting better. Good article.
      View article »
    • Mon Jul 21st 14:22 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Solar's Warm, But Not Hot - Barron's
      Subsidies to renewable energy, including solar, is one thing that congress agrees on.
      View article »
    • Tue Jul 15th 12:49 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Is There Value in Silicon Solar PV?
      All of the silicon solar companies are growing capacity rapidly. Some analysts seem to think that this growth will eventually push the group off a cliff as governments remove or reduce incentives for solar systems. This assumption is based on the fact that as production increases, solar incentives will become more costly for governments to fund.
      What is most likely to happen is that governments will reduce solar system incentives. This is not a problem for the industry as the costs of solar are decreasing. The cost of alternatives to solar like natural gas are increasing. That means governments can still get solar power to grow in the future with smaller incentives. Other uses like solar panels on electric cars could create additional demand. Hopefully solar will reach a point where it will grow without incentives.
      There are a lot of companies that are researching and even producing solar from thin-film technology. But they can not meet all of the demand from the market so silicon based solar still has tremendous room to grow. Many of the solar companies are sold out into next year. Article on my web site: "Solar Cell Manufacturers Have Room To Grow" shows how small a contribution solar is currently making to world electric production. Shorting these companies, especially the ones that have raised guidance is very dangerous. I am long CSIQ and TSL.
      View article »
    • Mon Jul 14th 14:01 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Solar Shorts Keep On Rising Even As Oil Surprises
      When you compare the cost of solar to other energy sources, solar used to be compared to the cost of coal. Since it will be very difficult to build a new coal-fired power plant now due to global warming considerations, the cost of solar should now be compared to the cost of natural gas. Maybe this is why solar seems to track with oil prices. New solar electric production will displace natural gas electric production. The cost of natural gas is rising while the cost of solar is dropping.

      There are also new applications for solar that could add to demand over the years. Toyota is planning to put solar panels on its Prius in 2010. This could be a developing trend with all electric and hybrid electric cars. As I discussed on my website, solar on a car is cost effective. The solar energy is displacing more expensive gasoline so the electricity produced on a car is worth 31.5 cents per Kwh based on $4.00 gasoline. At $5.00 gasoline the electricity produced is worth 40 cents per Kwh.
      View article »
    • Thu Jul 3rd 14:52 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      The 'Problem' With Solar Companies is Not Really a Problem
      Solar still requires subsidies as the cost is higher than comparable fossil fuel power. The cost of fossil fuel is going up and the cost of solar is going down. Some solar uses are cost effective now. I would expect that solar subsidies will drop per unit, but not be eliminated. Even will Spain cutting back subsidies, they are not the only country. There should still be enough demand for the industry to grow rapidly for the next several years.
      View article »
    • Wed Jul 2nd 13:51 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Will Some Solar Companies Face a Cash Crunch?
      These companies are making profits but sucking up cash. That would be expected as they are growing very rapidly. They need tremendous amounts of money to pay for new equipment plus the working capital to fund rapidly growing inventory. This would be typical for all rapidly growing manufacturing companies and does not by itself indicate a problem.
      These companies only get into a problem if demand for solar modules diminishes. I posted an article on my website: examiner.com/x-325-Glo...~y2008m5d20-Solar-Cell... where I explain why I think there will be no shortage in demand for solar cells.
      View article »
    • Thu Jun 26th 14:14 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      How the Fed's Decision Impacts You
      Good Article. The Fed is clearly keeping interest rates low to bail out the banks. Inflation will eventually start to take up the price of assets like houses and then all the mortgages and lines of credit become good again.
      Someone will have to pay for this. The government is effectively debasing our currency so people with savings, bonds, or fixed incomes will fare the worst. Owning real assets as the author described seems like good protection to me. I am currently looking for asset classes other than metals or oil that might offer protection from inflation. Was looking specifically at REITS. If anyone has on opinion on these, post an article or comment.
      View article »
    • Mon Jun 23rd 13:17 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      The 'Peak Oil' Myth: New Oil Is Plentiful
      The economics of higher oil prices cause us to seek ever more marginal and expensive petroleum resources. Sources like oil shale contain a lot of oil potential, but it is hugely expensive to extract that oil, both from a dollar cost and global warming prospective. We should be drilling our best, cleanest oil prospects now like ANWR and offshore, to give us time to develop clean alternatives so we don't end up producing from oil shale.
      View article »
    • Wed Jun 18th 18:02 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      6 Metal Stocks That Shine Brighter Than Gold
      The value add in aluminum is not from the mining operation or scarcity, but from the refining process. It is very energy intensive. You make money by having a cheap source of electricity that you can use to reduce the bauxite ore into aluminum metal.
      View article »
    • Tue Jun 17th 14:15 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Selling Some Yingli and Trina Solar on Dead Cat Bounce
      Don't confuse short term moves with long term trends. These stocks are very volatile. I discussed the long term potential of these stocks on my web site in the article 'Solar Cell Manufacturers Have Room to Grow'. Basically all of the solar cell manufacturers combined produce only a tiny fraction (0.17%) of world total electric production capacity in 2007. I like solar companies because they could triple production for several years before they catch up with demand. Trading: assume the long term trend is higher; buy the dips and sell the rallies.
      I am long term long CSIQ and TSL.
      View article »
    • Tue Jun 17th 11:32 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Oshkosh's Diesel Electric Hybrid Monster Truck
      I can't predict when electric cars will become viable options. Tesla is currently selling an all-electric car with a $109,000 price tag. It has very high end performance like 3.9 0 to 60 speed. 220 mile range. GM may be selling the Chevy Volt in 2010. That tells me that the battery technology is getting better. I look at this like many electronic devices where the first generation devices are bulky and expensive. Successive generations produce improved products at lower costs. Flat screen TVs, computers, cell phones, video games, etc are all examples. How fast electric cars happen, I don't know, but I do expect it will be worth watching.
      View article »