richjoy

Latest Comments
126 Comments

    • Sat May 10th 21:30 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Commodities: Bubble or Not?
      We are making a big deal of the spot price of a barrel of oil at the wellhead. As consumers, our main use of oil is fuel, mostly gasoline. After driving 513 miles since my last fillup, I filled my car a few hours ago at $3.549 at a nearby Walmart. (Incidentially, no one mentions that SHARP 46-inch 1080i LCD HD televisions are now sold there for only $1300!).

      So the issue is -- when is the price of gasoline going to hurt to the extent that it will change my lifestyle so much that I stop buying HD TV and other items?

      I don't know the answer, but I well recall waiting in lines a block long for gasoline during both the 1970s Arab Oil Embargos, when I was glad to get gasoline--at any price!...and so would you! (There was no Strategic Oil Reserve)

      Maybe one measure of our pain limit is the % of income devoted to purchasing gasoline. For most of us, $50 or $75 per week is far less than 5% of our gross income...it clearly hasn't hurt most of us yet, and another $25 a week (50% increase) may not hurt either.

      It is embarrassing that Americans think cheap gasoline is their right. Gasoline is taxed even more heavily in many countries, and costs the equivalent of $8-$10 per gallon (including Europe); they don't like it either, but they have learned to accommodated it...and it is very likely we will too.

      Riots?...nuclear war?...I think not! (Besides, we can't spare the troops from our other 2 wars.)

      Whimps! Stop your whinning and war mongering!

      Some good may come of this. Hopefully, we will finally get serious about alternative energies (and because it will take years to bring significant amounts of wind, solar, geo-thermal, etc. alternatives on-line, we should start drilling in ANWAR and our coastal areas ASAP). If Clinton had not vetoed ANWAR drilling 10 years ago, we would have 1.5 million barrels more oil today!
      View article »
    • Sat May 10th 16:11 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      There's a Solar Shakeout Coming - Citigroup
      I also like the ETFs, they make especially good sense for investing in infant industries (which solar still is).

      With respect to Citigroup’s Timothy Arcuri, I suspect not one of you who flame him has ever worked in a corporate invironment...if you had, you would know that some very bright folks work in poor companies, and visa versa. Simply put: your attacks lack credibility.
      View article »
    • Sat May 10th 15:55 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Commodities: Bubble or Not?
      Sorrry I'm late to this excellent discussion.

      When oil increases by 40% in a few months, this is a BUBBLE!...OK, I've said it.

      But more needs to be said:

      Basically, oil responds to supply/demand fundamentals--however, demand didn't increase by anything like 40% in a few months. But, like other investments, commodities do responds to speculation.

      I'm investing in oil, natural gas, and base metals stocks and ETFs, but for no purpose than to make a profit--so, I guess I'm a speculator...arn't you also?

      Bubbles burst, and the oil bubble may burst next week; but the bursting of these commodity bubbles are but brief temporary "corrections"... that constitute buying opportunities to higher price levels.

      This bubble-and-burst situation will continue until either supply increases sugnificantly (which will take decades), or demand is met (also may take decades).

      With respect to grains (and unlike the other commodities), supply can be increased rather quickly, even within 1 year in some cases. Therefore, gain bubbles should be burst much faster than those for oil, steel, nat. gas, etc. Still, worldwide demand for grains continues to grow, and prices tend to rise again. Thus, I also continue to invest in grain ETFs.

      Finally, I don't care what you call it--bubble, or fundamentals--it will continue to be a good investment.
      View article »
    • Fri May 9th 09:01 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Where's the Bursting Commodities Bubble?
      Commodities of all kinds are in greater demand from a world that is seeing great numbers of "have-nots" become "haves" and "striving-to-have... There will continue to be corrections in commodity prices and related stocks, but the march upward in commodity consumption will most likely continue for a very long time.

      What is to stop a growing demand curve?...the only things I can think of are (a) an event (depression, disaster, nuclear war, or deadly illness) so widespread that it there is no immediate recovery or rebuilding; or (b) demand is finally met (meaning most of the world has a living standard similar to ours and that of Europe).
      View article »
    • Thu May 8th 08:36 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Why Inflation Is Lower Than You Think
      I agree with Mr. Salmon's essay, and it needed to be said.

      I would add that there are ways all of us can reduce the impact of inflation on our own spending. Also that it was Alan Greenspan who went before Congress again and again to argue for reducing the rate at which Social Security recognized inflation.

      And finally, yes, inflation's most significant impact is on the poor--now that you have said it, do you feel better?...and what EXACTLY do you (seriously) propose is done to assist the poor?
      View article »
    • Tue May 6th 18:45 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Is Yang Still In Charge At Yahoo?
      This sounds like reason is finally showing up!
      View article »
    • Sun May 4th 12:42 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      The Wind Beneath Trinity's Wings
      Solar and wind are infant industries. I know there are several solar energy ETFs...are there any ETFs devoted to wind energy?

      I ask because I find picking winners among solar stocks to be exceedingly difficult, and assume the same would be true of wind energy stocks...thus I prefer ETFs.
      View article »
    • Sun May 4th 12:35 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      U.S. Dollar Signaling a Changing Tide?
      Mr. Fitzsimmons said it better than I could...his ONLY mistake might have been in saying "the Fed is INTENTIONALLY supporting inflation...". I would have preferred he had said the Fed's policies RISK supporting inflation in the making its priority that of fighting financial turbulance. (A small point perhaps, but important to many.)
      View article »
    • Sun May 4th 12:22 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Is the Commodity Bull Market Over?
      Mr. Rothbort is far more likely to be correct in his assessment than he is to be wrong. Thus, I too continue to view the present correction (or is it over already?) as a buying opportunity.

      Also, I echo lg71050 -- commodities are a global story; also it is much bigger than Chindia, look at Latin America, Eastern Europe, Southeast Asia (and soon Africa). People everywhere are more aware of what Americans and Europeans are eating, wearing, driving, and doing; they want the good life, and think they deserve it! Look for accelerating growth in infrustructure investments (steel, cement, electrical/electronic equipment, chemicals/fertilizers, and fuels.
      View article »
    • Fri May 2nd 09:07 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      The Commodities Bubble
      I don't think anyone can successfully talk commodities up...or down. True, they are subject to corrections.

      To thoroughly discuss commodities, we would need to take them one at a time, but speaking of commodities collectively, in the 'long-run', it is still a supply/demand equation. Demand is huge!...until either supply increases, or demand is curtailed (such as through a worldwide recession), the upward trend will continue (though hopefully, not at such a steep slope).

      My profits in agricutural commodities put a smile on my face...but I deeply regret food riots among people for whom food is a much larger proportion of their income. OTOH, I don't think the food situation would change if I divest myself.
      View article »
    • Fri May 2nd 08:16 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Awaiting Further Strength in Commodities
      Recession...what recession? As you wrote on May 2nd, you (should) know we are in a slowdown, and not yet in a recession (and may even escape without a recession)...unless of course, you define the word differently than the accepted definition -- in which case, you should have so stated.

      As for commodity prices, I generally agree (I disagree on gold, which seems to react more to 'unknown forces' than logic, thus I hold some gold, but not enough to significantly influence my portfolio unless it goes sky high or falls like a rock). Materials, metals, oil natural gas, and the like, have (perhaps) started a correction. However, given worldwide demand, I expect them to resume their upward trend.

      In fact, if the present rising stock market is a signal of an improving economy just over the horizon, I feel even more comfortable in owning them through a hopefully mild correction.
      View article »
    • Tue Apr 29th 08:46 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Is the Fed Bankrupting America?
      The WSJ editorial is powerfull...I'd like to see an opposing view.
      View article »
    • Tue Apr 29th 08:27 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      OPEC Signals U.S. Rally
      From the Jason Schwarz web site: "Clear writing = clear thinking"

      Well, it seems to me Mr. Schwarz is having a bit of fun with us...if you are going to tell a lie, be sure to include some truth.

      The lie: "If this [the dollar] strengthens by 10 percent, it is probable that [oil] prices will fall by 40 percent."

      The truth: "America’s on sale and the world is buying. Time to buy the S&P 500 (IVV)."

      Mr. Schwarz completely ignores the impact of supply and demand on price...the price of oil may 'correct' temporarilly due to (either or both) a stronger dollar and worldwide economic slowdown; but it will surely resume its upward climb until massive amounts of alternative energy sources are in operation.

      Surely America is on sale, with our deficits, the dollar cannot get so strong that our goods, or real estate, and our companies are not attractive acquisitions to foreign peoples and companies.

      p.s. The rest of the world is laughing at the Americans...we are whinning about the cost of carbon-based energy, while they have less disposable income and have adjusted to gasoline prices equivalent to $10/gallon. Get over it! Institute a "Manhatten Project" for alternative energy, and secure your independence from Middle East oil!
      View article »
    • Sun Apr 27th 09:48 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Chesapeake Energy, Monsanto: Paying Tit for Tat
      Sorry worthy...though I too go long the ETFs and the company stocksworthy, I disagree with your condemnation of options.

      Options are a viable way to play the boom market for commodities.

      In fact, options provide a way to far greater profits than your approach, with far less invested.

      There is lots of room for both approaches (and I'm sure Mr. Zanoni would suggest you use options for only a portion of your investment allocation.
      View article »
    • Sun Apr 27th 09:39 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      EFA More Attractive Than SPY
      Thank you...well laid out.
      I'll consider this to be "news I can use".
      View article »