Mike Stathis

comments35
  • Positive ratings 0
  • Negative ratings 0
  • Net rating 0
Filter comments by:
Highest rated Latest comments

Latest Comments
35 Comments

    • Fri Jul 4th 00:33 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Dow in Secular Bear Market When Priced in Ounces of Gold
      My friend, the fact is that the US stock market has been in a secular bear market since 2001, without factoring in the price of gold. And it will remain in this corrective market for several more years.

      Now, when adjusted for the price of gold or the dollar's slide, the market is much worse.
      View article »
    • Wed Jul 2nd 19:27 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Russell 3000 Sheds Nearly $2 Trillion in Cap Value
      "It was Sept. 10 last year when the Fed actually cut interest rates as a response to the credit crunch. Even in late August, everyone was debating the extent of what was going on..." said Stephen Wood, Russell's senior portfolio strategist.

      This is precisely why the Russell is in shambles. Those who did not see the full extent of what was going on by August were lost. Unfortunately, the follow-the-leader mentality so widespread on Wall Street led to 99.99% of the "experts" missing everything.

      View article »
    • Wed Jul 2nd 19:19 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Have the Financials Found Their Bottom?
      Ditto Spada.

      View article »
    • Wed Jul 2nd 09:20 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Investors Beware: Reporters Trying to Help
      Anyone who works as a financial professional that says "inflation might be on the way" should be demoted, fired, or sued, depending on their position. WHAT A JOKE.

      Thanks for the post Kevin. I rarely waste time reading print media, but now that I have seen this I am going to contact the Post and let them know how irresponsible they were for interviewing these agenda-minded clowns.

      I'm so disgusted at the continued irresponsibility of the media. They only care to sale headlines like "Ways to Profit In A Declining Market" or downplaying the realities via orders from Washington. They should keep it simple and tell the truth - get out and stay out!

      Investors need to understand these people with agendas will always steer you wrong to make a buck. Funds will try to keep you in a declining market by preaching "think long term" or "stay the course."

      Diversification will not help you navigate this market. Everything will be taken down, including the 4 companies Trejos names. They may hold up longer than others (excluding GE and GS) but they will eventually join the rest of the pack. "It's the market stupid!"

      I will tell you this as well..Goldman Sachs is going to get cut in half. No financial firm can escape the wrath of this correction; at best they can only delay the inevitable as BAC has for so long. But now we see BAC has gotten crushed and will soon be at $18. MER will soon join BAC.

      The best advice for this market is cash. If you are a skilled trader wanting some excitement and willing to take your licks, you can play the momentum swings...get in and get out. Otherwise, stay completely out until the washout is complete (several years).

      A global meltdown is on the way. I will be looking to get into Brazil after a correction and China after things bottom out.
      View article »
    • Thu Jun 26th 14:58 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Is the Equities Party Over?
      In a May 5 article on SA, I advised investors to sell the market (Stay Clear of Traditional Asset Classes)

      seekingalpha.com/artic...

      At the time, the Dow was around 13,100.

      View article »
    • Mon Jun 9th 18:55 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Stay Clear of Traditional Asset Classes
      Dogtownsurf, I tried to warn investors the market was going to sell off. Since the article was posted a month ago, the Dow is down by nearly 900 points. Yet, as you can see, rather than take my advice and sell, many of these people would rather take cheap shots at me. This gives you an idea about the general audience on Seeking Alpha and it is one reason why I don't even bother to waste my time posting here anymore. The other reason is due to the fact that SA censors articles. They will only post material that has daily trading implications, which prevents any commentary about bigger picture events or things expected down the road. In short, I have come to realize that SA caters to the same people who waste time watching Cramer and other trash on CNBC, and I want to distance myself as far from that trash as possible.

      You are right on both accounts - I try to be conservative so as not to disappoint. I find my success rate on predictions is extremely high when I am conservative. Yet, to many I seem extreme. remarkable isn't it? And yes indeed - no one in the position to fix things is. Indeed, I am sure Volcker is puking in disgust as he watches Bernanke intentionally destroy the dollar, along with the opportunities Americans once claimed made this nation filled with hope. At least you have the California coast to enjoy - something the Fed cannot easily destroy.

      View article »
    • Mon May 19th 23:58 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Diving Into the Water ETF
      Good writeup showing that some ETFs aren't what they appear to be but instead have jumped on some investment buzz bandwagon as a way to selll the fund.
      View article »
    • Fri May 16th 10:55 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Learning From Bill Miller's Recent Underperformance
      I don't get how so many people can be so blind. Miller manages a VALUE TRUST. Any idiot can beat the S&P 500 when they are buying ENORMOUS STAKES of GOOG and YHOO! The fact is that Miller's funds have beat the S&P in the past because the S&P was NOT an accurate gauge of performance, as the riskiness of his portfolio was higher than the S&P and was NOT comparable.

      When you hear the praise of the media making ridculous and unfounded claims that he has beaten the S&P for 15 years, you need to investigate whether his holdings and percentage of holdings is in fact comparable to the S&P 500.

      Bill Miller is not impressive. he has benefited from Legg Mason's huge marketing that has made inaccurate claims which have fooled the investment public, most of which who are clueless.
      View article »
    • Thu May 15th 01:45 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Stay Clear of Traditional Asset Classes
      Wrong Middle. Healthcare is NOT going up due to boomer demographics. Boomers have not even turned 65 yet. Boomer demographics over the next 20 years WILL make the problems worse, namely due to the crisis in chronic disease management, which already constitutes over 70% of all healthcare expenses. But right now the costs are due to the excessive profiteering by the healthcare mafia – HMOs, drug companies, device makers, etc. This is a fact.

      How is it that the U.S. spends 18% of GDP on healthcare and has the highest rate of medical errors, 50 million without coverage, nearly 1 million medically-related bankruptcies each year, and a ranking of 37th by the WHO – yet, most of the rest of the world has healthcare expenditures ranging from 6-8% of GDP, with virtually no fraud, less waste, much fewer medical errors, and much better rankings? Answer: a healthcare "free-for-all&quo... among the providers who focus on profits and often sacrafice quality care.

      In fact, according to studies from John’s Hopkins (Dr. Starfield--google it), due to medical errors, physicians are now the #3 cause of death in America.


      View article »
    • Wed May 14th 22:11 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      The Beginning of the End of the Credit Crisis?
      The credit crisis is taking a rest, but is by no means over and most likely has not even bottomed.
      View article »
    • Wed May 14th 22:02 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Financials ETF: The Worst May Be Behind Us
      The banking mess will take many years to fix. The worst is by no means behind us. Gaucho is correct. See my series of articles to be posted starting tomorrow on how Washington is fooling us with its manipulation of economic data.

      If you really are interested in the banks, I suggest you keep a close eye on all of the stock offerings that have been going on, most without much media fanfare. Shareholders are getting diluted down to nothing and this will continue. Just take a look at the recent dilution of WM. So with all of this dilution occuring combined with banks having to sell off their assets, how do you expect earnings to recover anytime soon???

      With so much blood in the streets, yet so much more waiting to spill, why get involved in the financials of all things????

      Stick with oil, other commodities, foreign currencies, precious metals, and healthcare.
      View article »
    • Wed May 14th 21:53 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Material Sciences: Small Company to Post Big Earnings
      LOL Peregina, that made me laugh!! But please try to be more constructive, as we are human and no one is perfect.

      Okay here's my take. With all due respect, the fundamentals look potentially promising, but only for risk-averse, long-term investors. The big concern I have right now are the miserable profit margins. Management will need to turn that around or else they won't do anything.

      As far as technicals, I can't see the "very bullish" pattern you mention. In fact, short-term, it has significant downside as it just broke through the 50 DMA.

      "They have missed on earnings for the last three quarters, but they beat earnings by 250% the first quarter of last year.." That should serve as an indicator. As far as last year in concerned, that was last year - a year that saw the Dow surpass 14,000, a year in which the real estate and banking fall out had just begun, a year when global inflation was not yet detected, etc.

      Be careful using generic chart patterns (double tops, etc.) as indicators. Ofetn they can do more harm than good. I personally don't pay attention to them. I look at basic charting elements. If you know how to read charts, you won't have a need to look to spot these generic patterns (preached by IBD to novices) to spot bull/bear trends.
      View article »
    • Wed May 14th 21:38 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Monsanto: Turn Rising Food Prices Into Profits
      While I appreciate the author’s commentary, I’d like to add a few important points:

      (1) I think this material is a bit outdated – by at least 3 years. If you take a look at the stock price since then as well as the current food problems, especially with corn, ethanol, etc., it appears to me that some less informed investors might rush into this stock thinking it will soar from here.

      (2) I did not see any treatment of risk or any of the controversial issues that are rising in momentum. Without this, there is no way an investor can make a reasonable decision. Namely, many nations have banned Monsanto’s GM crops, which puts a nice cap of growth. As well, even in the USA, many consumers are protesting the safety of GM-crops, and there is significant scientific evidence that these concerns have merit. At some point, growth will be limited to population growth plus some premium. While that point may not occur for a while, the lack of global acceptance of GM crops is concerning.

      Finally, the future of patent laws for biotech is highly uncertain. In support of the author’s estimates (although not mentioned), the fact is that the USPTO has permitted Monsanto to establish a monopoly in GM crops due to its world-leading number of biotechnology claimed patents, at nearly 700. This bodes well for them. However, the laws surrounding biotechnology intellectual property are still way up in the air and things could change at any time. If the USPTO ruled that Monsanto was no longer able to claim ownership rights to GM, this could turn the company upside down overnight. As you will recall, prior to 2003, MON was struggling for growth, and the stock bottomed in the low teens.

      In conclusion, it's easy to be bullish on a stock that's had a great run, especially when the dumb money has recently bought it (i.e. the clowns who watch Cramer, who apparently recommended the stock a month ago). But the sophisticated investor will weigh all of the data - the pros and cons - and look at current market risk as well as the run that stock has made prior to making the determination whether it fits his or her investment horizon and risk tolerance. It looks as if bkinn understands this philosophy.


      View article »
    • Wed May 14th 02:41 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      JPMorgan, Bear Stearns: More Smoke from Wall Street
      fxtrader, you are missing the point behind the inequity of the situation, which raises suspicions as to what's going on at the Fed.

      jimmy46, not true at all. I'm saying you have to treat all banks fairly. I think there should be no bailouts. Read my previous artcles and you will see.
      View article »
    • Tue May 13th 18:40 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Asset Allocation as a Method for Risk Management
      Richard, you forgot the most powerful asset that minimizes investment risk - cash. As I'm sure you are aware, market risk is the largest risk investors face - a risk that is non-diversifiable (systemic risk). Thus, those who are able to use market forecasting combined with appropriate liquidation (i.e. market timing) will do quite well.

      Diversification is best used for passive investors and investors with short horizons; otherwise, it actually lowers your total returns.
      View article »