Jim Hawthorne

Latest Comments
84 Comments

    • Tue Nov 18th 17:47 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Four Commonsense Clues to a Genuine Market Bottom
      Gennady, thanks for a thoughtful article on this tricky subject. The vast majority of the bottom calls we have been plagued with over the last few months offer no real method behind the call, other than the old saw that the market is oversold, and therefore can go no lower. This rubbish has resulted in much loss of coin.

      At least, you have put some effort and discipline into your approach!

      That said, it is my opinion that we make a mistake when we attempt to view a true bear market bottom as a singular event rather than a PROCESS of price/time.

      The so-called bottom of 2002-2003 spanned the better part of 5 months as I recollect!
      View article »
    • Sun Nov 16th 15:34 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Four Reasons Stock Market Hope Will Overcome Despair
      Dear Jason,
      I'm sure that there are special places in both investing heaven and investing hell for unbridled optimists such as yourself! In a period when pessimism has not only finally become respectable, but has become the norm, you still manage to search for the half-full glass hiding amongst the sea of empties.
      However; none of the bailouts will work; Paulson is looking more and more like a fool; the consumer will do no better at saving our collective ass than will governments; massive hedge fund redemptions will spawn massive selling at every opportune rally from now til December 31st, and maybe beyond.
      Nevertheless, I can still applaud your lonely cheerleading. I assume your patron Saint goes by the name of Jude. If our paths ever cross, I will buy you a beer, just for your efforts.
      Hope is a lousy investment strategy...
      View article »
    • Fri Nov 14th 09:53 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Anvil Mining: Rorschach Test for Investors
      Anvil and a host of junior Canadian miners like TGB, NAK, and NXG are in deep doo-doo for a number of reasons, including the plunge in copper prices.

      Spot copper prices have lately become my little canary in the mine. As a quick indicator of market mood, spot copper is more reliable LATELY than index futures.

      View article »
    • Mon Nov 10th 12:13 PM
      |
      Rating: +2 -1
      Commented on:
      President-Elect Obama and the U.S. Dollar
      The recent $ rally may be more due to the fact that the $ is the best bet of a bad lot. Like betting on a jackass in a field of burros. There haven't been many sound options...

      To say we are worried about an Obama administration at this point is like worrying about a helmsman change on board the Titanic. We continue to be far more worried about the fallout from the antics of the current administration to be overly concerned about the next.

      View article »
    • Mon Nov 10th 12:03 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      How Will Obama's Victory Affect the Dollar?
      Stoker, you need to re-read the article...
      Kathy is calling for a possible $ rally vis a vis other major currencies.
      Do a little nuance!
      View article »
    • Mon Oct 27th 14:33 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Some Good News for Investors
      Tyler:
      The current state of the markets is due to NEITHER a highly excitable media nor a 'mob mentality'.
      Don't hold your breath for a sustainable upturn in equities, either. The great FOREX unwind is just beginning!
      View article »
    • Wed Oct 15th 08:41 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      The Dangers of Timing the Market
      This article is pure rubbish. At the end of WW II, we were the last economy standing, and have been the dominant economy ever since. Yes, the good times surely rolled. We are now in the process of a seismic global financial, economic and market shift, and the assumptions that any US stock we somehow consider "good" will automatically rise over time, and that we will continue to profitably grow at past rates are questionable.

      In addition, there is a HUGE distinction between "market timing" (attempting to anticipate or predict major market movements) and "trend following" (recognizing major uptrends and downtrends and acting accordingly).

      While PREDICTING market moves in advance is very tough, spotting TRENDS is not!

      The author uses mutual funds as a benchmark. There is not one, NOT ONE mutual fund manager who does not engage in trend following!

      The most successful traders do likewise!
      View article »
    • Sun Oct 12th 20:32 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Three Positive Developments for Equities
      Your final paragraph tends to contradict the first, in which you speak (correctly) about humility.
      With all humility, let me suggest that the last thing you should be doing is offering predictions based on real or imagined "valuation" at the current time!

      By all means, be humble. If not, this market will surely do it for you!
      View article »
    • Fri Oct 10th 07:31 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      This Bear Market is Worse Than I Thought
      You say, "The Fed is throwing the kitchen sink at this market and the market is speaking loudly; the Fed is too late." It seems that many of us simply take it for granted that it is the Fed's job to "save" the market. This is not quite the case.

      Today, the Fed's stated mission and mandate is: "The purpose of the Federal Reserve System originally focused on lending banks money to ensure that they would have sufficient cash in times of seasonal shortages and incipient panics as well as to provide currency to the banking system. The Fed also was to supervise state-chartered banks to maintain their stability and compliance with the federal banking laws. But, as the financial industry and the economy evolved and developed, the scope of the Federal Reserve's mission also expanded. Today, the Federal Reserve System has three distinct functions: supervising banks, including bank holding companies, many state-chartered banks, and international banks; running huge payments systems that involve processing checks and transferring funds electronically; and monitoring and adjusting monetary policy to guard the economy against high inflation and recession."

      It is true that the policies of the Greenspan Fed encouraged us to feed the bubble that has just burst like a super nova through the cheap supply of money coupled with loose lending standards, shoddy oversight of the banks and keeping interest rates too low for too long. It is not true that the Fed has a mandate to save us from ourselves.

      What is happening is the deflation of a truly financialised system built on paper debt with precious little real support, and we were all too willing to belly up to the bar and play the game.

      While historical looks backward at the 2000 through 2002 bear market are useful (see the bottoming process that went of from July 2002 through March 2003, for example), conditions then were quite different in terms of inflation, consumption, overvaluation and growth.

      While we will see series of "pop and drop" rallies, these will be opportunities for only the most disciplined, flexible and nimble traders. We are witnessing the destruction of markets, and I agree that the consolidation, healing and recovery of those markets will be a long, slow bottoming process, and that there is still more pain to come.

      View article »
    • Thu Oct 9th 22:11 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      IBM's Quarter Can Lead the Equity Market Recovery
      Bill!
      I have always had the most profound respect for your opinions and analysis.
      This time around, I feel that there was more opinion than analysis.
      Last night, i dredged up a daily chart running from mid-May, 2002 through March 31, 2003.
      The "false bottom" that formed in mid-July, 2002 bears a stunning similarity to the point we are at as of today, and then as now, there were lots of pundits that called that "false bottom" the real McCoy.
      Bear market bottoms are NOT dates on a calendar!
      Bear market bottoms are in fact a process that takes months of consolidation and re-building to complete.
      We will have some typical "pop & drop" rallies that will be profitable for the flexible and nimble trader, but we are far from any long term "recovery", Bill.
      View article »
    • Sat Oct 4th 19:44 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      The Glass Is Half Full
      True, fa28!

      I have no problem recognizing and understanding the witch's brew of greedy financial blunders, poor economic policies and sheer denial that have emptied the glass!

      I have much more difficulty recognizing the elements that will assist in the refilling of the glass!

      Perhaps they're just too far over the horizon?
      View article »
    • Sat Oct 4th 17:42 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Five Energy Companies That Spell Opportunity
      finmah! Your claim to "Take a look at New Zealand stocks to see what happens under the big government" begs for some investigation...

      Yes, let's take a look at New Zealand.... The NZ50 index has risen about 28% over the last 5 years as compared to the S&P500's 12% over the same time period!

      Want to try Canada? Okay, the S&P/TSX is up a whopping 57% over the past 5 years!

      Want to try Sweden? Okay, the Stockholm OMXS All Share is up 48% over the last 5 years...

      Both New Zealand and Canada instituted "emergency" goods and services taxation 15-20 years ago to tackle what they perceived as a HUGE National Debt problem. At the time, this measure was met with doom and gloom prognostications that it would sink their respective economies. Today, the Canadian National Debt is just over $800Bln or about $18,000 per person, and they're still worried! The USA National debt is running between $33,000 and $37,000 per person depending on just when you choose to cut off the numbers.

      I'm not blaming him for the entire problem, but on the day President Bush took office, the national debt stood at $5.727 trillion. The latest number from the Treasury Department (if you choose to believe it) shows the national debt now stands at more than $9.849 trillion. That’s a 71.9 percent increase over the last 71/2 years.

      Amazing! It would at least appear on the surface that New Zealand, Sweden and Canada, all countries of "Big Government" are reducing their debt while enjoying eye-popping stock market returns because they actually produce and export more "things" than they import. (Yes, they enjoy a trade surplus).

      Our major export appears to have been Treasuries, and it looks like there will be fewer and fewer buyers of our debt.

      If we're good traders, we'll make good trades; regardless of who is in the White House!

      I would dearly love to be proven wrong here, but I'm having a real hard time understanding your arguments, finmah!
      View article »
    • Sat Oct 4th 11:10 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Five Energy Companies That Spell Opportunity
      Believing that "Other People’s Problems" have a nasty habit of suddenly becoming MY problems, and that conventional wisdom's perceptions of "Opportunities for long-term investors" have been popping up with stomach-churning regularity over the past 10 months, I would recommend extreme caution.

      The S&P500 fell about 47.5% after September 1st 2000 (from 1520 pts. to 800pts.) to finally bottom early October, 2002.

      The path downward was littered with failed "opportunities for long-term investors" that have not recovered to this day!

      So far, we have dropped about 29.5% since last October's top. Those fantastic "opportunities for long-term investors" advocated back in May, 1998 that have survived the past decade are once again breaking even based on the indexes.

      Rather than advocating yet another package of "opportunities for long-term investors", why not advocate the characteristics that will produce successful investors and traders in the current environment?

      Chief among these are flexibility, quick reactions to changes in the markets, lowered profit thresholds and a patient focus on short-term set-ups with tight stops.

      Anyone advocating a long-term, buy and hold investment strategy in this high-risk environment is either a masochist or has far, far more wealth that they can afford to watch dissolve than they deserve!

      There may well be short-term opportunities in some of the stocks you recommend. Only the flexible and nimble trader will profit from them.
      View article »
    • Thu Oct 2nd 09:18 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Fear and Greed: Premise for Capitulation and Overreaction
      Did I read you correctly? You seem to be saying that once the banking system stabilizes and the banks start lending again, we'll be okay???

      In other words, let's just hope and pray that we can somehow re-inflate the bubble???

      Look, it was 'over-easy' credit, a delusional perception of endless money supply, and arcane vehicles that masked risk that got us into this mess in the first place!

      Make no mistake! Short sellers DID NOT 'nearly ruin the economy'! Rather, the collusion of Wall Street Banks, the Fed Reserve and gross negligence by the rating agencies and lack of due diligence and oversight laid the final straws on the back of a very sick and ailing economy, and presented a target-rich environment for short-sellers.

      This blaming of the short sellers is ridiculous! If you think for one minute that a short selling ban will save the markets, you'd best take a peek at the Shanghai exchange's performance over the past year! They have banned short-selling as a general rule, and it has failed miserably!

      Short sellers have to eventually cover by buying; this is the buying action that induces confidence and leads other buyers into the markets! Eliminating short-sellers results in eliminating a unique class of 'captive buyers', and it is the short-squeeze at the bottom that ignites a great upturn!

      In the meantime, what we have to recognize is the seismic shift that is occurring before our eyes. Investment opportunities abound where there is sound economic growth based on increased production and expanding markets, NOT simply loose credit and expanding debt!

      Now, we have the ludicrous situation of the arsonists (Hank, Ben, and company) presenting us with the solution and posing as the firemen!

      Be nimble, my friends, and conserve your capital! Above all, look for opportunities elsewhere than where you've found them in the past!
      View article »
    • Fri Sep 26th 17:33 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      The Secret Villain Behind Our Economic Collapse
      Very good article! Thanks!
      I think Paulson's "embarrassment&qu... is rather shallow...

      Last summer, we all remember Paulson's assurances that the upheaval in the Financials (he refused to admit to a crisis) was limited to the subprime and was and would continue to be contained.

      We now know that this was false.

      Now, it's very had for me to believe that the Secretary of the Treasury of the United States had such a dismally poor grasp of what was really going on, and the true depth of the problem.

      If in fact Paulson did not know, then he has no business being the Secretary of the Treasury.

      If in fact he did know, then he was guilty of lying to Congress and all Americans.

      Either way, Paulson and Bernanke have lost the confidence of the American people, and have betrayed their trust.

      It is time for them to go.

      It is silly and ridiculous to expect those who were, at least in part, the architects of the current financial disaster to play key roles in the rescue and reconstruction. As Kevin Phillips remarked, the arsonists now want to be applauded as firemen!
      View article »