verggreatness

comments22
  • Positive ratings 0
  • Negative ratings 0
  • Net rating 0
Filter comments by:
Highest rated Latest comments
Or filter by symbol:

Latest Comments
22 Comments

    • Mon Jul 7th 05:22 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Georgetown Partners' Latest Radio Proposal Raises Many Questions
      blah, blah, blah,.....doesn't matter because if the merger doesn't go through Clear Channel will buy XM and have 50% of SDARS.....just get the merger done already because you bet Clear Channel would love to cash in and get XM at a steep discount.
      View article »
    • Sun Jul 6th 11:51 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Sirius and XM Satellite Merger Set for Approval; RBC Lowers Price Targets
      I don't think the merger is going to happen now...The FCC is just waiting until one of these companies go under.
      View article »
    • Thu Jul 3rd 12:48 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Hydrogenics: Shares Continue to Rise
      HYGS ain't going anywhere though. They have millions in backorders and getting more and more orders everyday. hydrogen isn't just for cars, there is also a commercial demand that's growing dramatically
      View article »
    • Thu Jul 3rd 12:46 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Hydrogenics: Shares Continue to Rise
      i sold at 2.15....I knew this stock would tumble faster than it rose. I plan to buy back at 1.25 or maybe lower.
      View article »
    • Sun Jun 29th 12:35 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Why Did Satellite Stocks Head North Friday?
      163888, hydrogen cars wouldn't be so expensive if it was backed by our government. Our government would rather find more places to drill oil than spend the money needed for mass production of hydrogen powered vehicles. That's why there so expensive. It's politically correct for our own government to spend crazy amounts of money finding more oil when the oil companies are paying billions in taxes.
      View article »
    • Thu May 22nd 18:58 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Cowen Sees Upside for Sirius
      If merged they should be required to give up atleast half spectrum. FCC, please require this if approved. I know you guys will not go against the consumer.
      View article »
    • Wed May 21st 13:17 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Cowen Sees Upside for Sirius
      It's not going to get FCC approval guys. It's a monopoly because there will only be one player in the market. I am disgusted with everyone that thinks this will be a good thing for the consumer. We need to see the big picture here. GO FCC! I praise your hard stance on waiting this merger out and seeing the greed of these companies.
      View article »
    • Wed May 14th 02:19 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Sirius, XM: Price Targets and Expectations
      I agree, the future is Satellite Radio, whether it be a combined company or just one in the end. Remember the day you wish you would have invested in Microsoft or Walmart. Well here's your chance again.
      View article »
    • Fri May 9th 16:49 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      'The Worst Is Over for Financials' - Really?
      Yep, as were typing away our anger a CEO is out there somewhere on his yacht living the HIGH life even as his company loses billions. Our government prosecutes but also protects those with big money.
      View article »
    • Thu May 8th 05:56 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Sirius/XM Competition Benefits Consumers
      I couldn't agree more. This is something 99.9% of the people know. The other .01% being the FCC.
      View article »
    • Fri Apr 25th 15:07 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      CITI: $8 Target on Sirius
      Ha Ha, the stock didn't spike on a positive article for once. I guess the game is over manipulating this stock. The normal trader is figuring this game out. We all know the flow now. "Devise a positive article, get people to buy, then start bashing the stock back down again." Also, I agree with 168418 the FCC is making a point their not letting DOJ dictate what and WHEN they make a decision. In other words the FCC is making a point here. Maybe FCC would have already made a decision if DOJ hadn't approved. Something to think about.
      View article »
    • Fri Apr 25th 12:40 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      CITI: $8 Target on Sirius
      Be wary, be real wary about articles like this. This stock is all about emotion so if it does jump to just over 3 SELL then buy back at 2.50.
      View article »
    • Tue Apr 22nd 13:15 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Don't Count on a Fast Turnaround for Thornburg Mortgage
      From reading this 100% negative post we should all sell TMA. Not one sentence in this article was positive. This guy seems severely depressed with nothing but negative vibe. Gotta look at the big picture and again I see TMA at 3 to 4 by the end of 08.
      View article »
    • Mon Apr 21st 18:50 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Don't Count on a Fast Turnaround for Thornburg Mortgage
      I agree with you that I don't care about paying big bucks for gas. People in this country need to walk more anyway. Maybe this is a wakeup call. Our country is full of fat people and were addicted to oil. I think it's kind of selfish that some people care more about the price of gas than people getting tourtured and raped in other countries. I love hearing people complain about the price per gallon of gas. As for TMA I'm long and look forward to a turnaround. I think it's a 3 to 4 stock by the end of the year.
      View article »
    • Mon Apr 21st 15:23 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Don't Count on a Fast Turnaround for Thornburg Mortgage
      So Fraley are you blaming Bush for the subprime crisis? If you do then give a good reason why. It's easy to follow the herd buddy. You have been duped. Our current legistlation is having to step in because many of the lenders were taking risky measures. How can you blame Bush for that?
      View article »