David D.

comments9
  • Positive ratings 0
  • Negative ratings 0
  • Net rating 0
Filter comments by:
Highest rated Latest comments
Or filter by symbol:

Latest Comments
9 Comments

    • Thu Oct 2nd 08:51 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Did Buffett Kill the (First) Wells Fargo-Wachovia Deal?
      All you do with you postings on Wells Fargo is to pipe off supposition and rumor. This is not a contribution to the world of ideas.
      View article »
    • Sat Sep 13th 05:27 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Wells Fargo Is Quietly Expanding Its Business
      Thanks for this highlight. The best businesses, and the best corporate cultures, are built through organic growth and modestly sized bolt-on acquisitions; not large transformational acquisitions. Kudos to WFC.
      View article »
    • Sat Sep 13th 05:27 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Wells Fargo Is Quietly Expanding Its Business
      Thanks for this highlight. The best businesses, and the best corporate cultures, are built through organic growth and modestly sized bolt-on acquisitions; not large transformational acquisitions. Kudos to WFC.
      View article »
    • Fri Sep 5th 03:35 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Why Buy MLPs?
      I fully agree that, as of this writing, it is a great time to purchase these energy MLPs. They are broadly cheap as a group. They are under-owned by institutional investors and their need to regularly access the capital markets to fund expansion, somewhat like business development companies (e.g. ACAS, ALD, GLAD) is depressing their share prices to the extent that their cost of capital has risen. The Sem Group bankruptcy in Oklahoma has also hurt perceptions. These issues will, however, dissipate over time as the reliable "toll-taker" nature of the business shines through.

      The author also usefully mentions KMR as a nice alternative to dealing with the K-1s and as an option for those investors who would like energy infrastructure MLPs in their IRA accounts. In that regard, I would also like to highlight a second option, corporations, acting somewhat akin to closed-end mutual funds, that specialize in holding pipeline MLPs. These include symbols TYG and KYN. They both have good yields, are diversified among MLPs moving crude, refined products, and natural gas. Above all, they are themselves structured as corporations, not limited partnerships, so you get a normal 1099-DIV, not a K-1. That means less complicated tax filing AND qualified dividends. Yet, it gets better. Because of the underlying tax deferral qualities of the MLP structure, and since these two corporations own exclusively MLPs, your 1099-DIV will still characterize a substantial amount of your quarterly dividends as return of capital, which lowers your tax obligation. Of TYG and KYN, my personal favorite is the former. The URL is www.tortoiseadvisors.c.... Thanks for the MLP write-up.
      View article »
    • Wed Sep 3rd 19:15 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Allied Irish Banks: With 9% Dividend, This Bank Could Thrive
      The question raised by Mr. Johnson (i.e. "User 190898") is a fair one which I perhaps should have addressed inside the article.

      Ireland does withhold 20% as per the EU norm, UK excepted, I believe. Canada does the same. However, it is very easily reclaimed on your tax filing irrespective of your tax bracket or filing status. That is to say, you still get 100% of the dividend, you just get some of it as a credit on your taxes. It takes the form of an entry in box 6 of form 1099-DIV from the brokerage firm indicating the foreign tax paid. This full amount is then entered for a credit on the second side of the standard 1040. On the 2007 verion of the 1040, it was line 51, titled, "Foreign Tax Credit." It is terribly easy to accomplish and, when dealing with publicly traded stocks, as opposed to control stakes in a private, foreign-domiciled businesses, there are no extra supplemental forms.

      While easily done, I fully concede that a more rigorous analysis of AIB's pluses and minuses would entail a time value of money calculation taking into account some months of lost interest on that withheld 20%.

      The Irish government's tax policy, a matter of remarkable clarity, is outlined in the link below.

      Cordially,
      DD


      www.idaireland.com/upl...
      View article »
    • Wed Sep 3rd 19:15 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Allied Irish Banks: With 9% Dividend, This Bank Could Thrive
      The question raised by Mr. Johnson (i.e. "User 190898") is a fair one which I perhaps should have addressed inside the article.

      Ireland does withhold 20% as per the EU norm, UK excepted, I believe. Canada does the same. However, it is very easily reclaimed on your tax filing irrespective of your tax bracket or filing status. That is to say, you still get 100% of the dividend, you just get some of it as a credit on your taxes. It takes the form of an entry in box 6 of form 1099-DIV from the brokerage firm indicating the foreign tax paid. This full amount is then entered for a credit on the second side of the standard 1040. On the 2007 verion of the 1040, it was line 51, titled, "Foreign Tax Credit." It is terribly easy to accomplish and, when dealing with publicly traded stocks, as opposed to control stakes in a private, foreign-domiciled businesses, there are no extra supplemental forms.

      While easily done, I fully concede that a more rigorous analysis of AIB's pluses and minuses would entail a time value of money calculation taking into account some months of lost interest on that withheld 20%.

      The Irish government's tax policy, a matter of remarkable clarity, is outlined in the link below.

      Cordially,
      DD


      www.idaireland.com/upl...
      View article »
    • Sun Aug 31st 11:12 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      While Street Yells 'Sell!' Lampert Buys Back 4% of Sears
      Whatever the future may hold, Lampert's results thus far are surely a source of secret satisfaction, schadenfreude even, for the legions of corporate executives who field calls and hear out complaints from us know-it-all finance types as we second guess their operational, engineering, R&D, marketing, and HR-related decisions. The truth of the matter is that it takes all kinds of business school disciplines to run a company and even some occasional scientists and liberal arts types. For its part, Sears is being run into the ground for want of talent and investment on the management, marketing, and operations fronts. Having a finance genius perched atop is alone insufficient.
      View article »
    • Fri Jul 11th 10:49 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Opportunity Now in Franklin Templeton
      Two things to bear in mind are as follows:

      A. The asset management business is attractive but if you look deep in Franklin's financials you will find that they have also been in the business of securitizing car loans. However much of a sideline, I imagine that this gives the market pause at times like this.

      B. I would maintain that TROW has a higher valuation NOT, as everyone assumes, because their AUM is heavy equity but rather because they have a strong presence in the defined contribution pension (401 K) market which provides more assured cash flows at times like these. Franklin is comparatively weak in that area. Where are the Franklin-Templeton target date funds? Meanwhile the place where Franklin is quite strong happens to be overseas and particularly Europe --speaking in terms of not only invested AUM but more the sourcing of the AUM (i.e. the country where the client is domiciled). Everyone sees "overseas" as sexy but Europeans are notoriously fickle about their mutual fund or "investment trust" holdings. They dump their shares at the slightest sign of a downturn and are far, far less inclined than Americans to buy and hold. This is why so-called structured investment products are so popular in Europe. In any event, the point is that TROW's domestic DC plan strength looks good at the moment while BEN's asset gathering in foreign lands looks like a source of weakness at the moment.

      Thanks for your thoughtful piece.
      View article »
    • Wed Jun 4th 17:17 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Status Report: Wrigley / Mars
      How do you project closing of the Wrigley-Mars deal as soon as August 2008 when, at the 28 April 2008 press conference, Bill Wrigley projected 6-12 months for closing?
      View article »