Anil

Loading...
Symbols:
Authors:
comments9
  • Positive ratings 0
  • Negative ratings 0
  • Net rating 0
Filter comments by:
Highest rated Latest comments
Or filter by symbol:

Latest Comments
9 Comments

    • Fri Oct 17th 13:22 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      SiRF: Undervalued or Value Trap?
      Hi Joe

      That's an interesting view. However I am not in agreement that public companies are valued lower than private.

      If there is dearth of quality private companies looking for capital or a specific VC firm has trouble with deal flow or funnel then its another story. I think the valuation in Private company adjust to new valuation at each round dynamically. But since they are not traded every day, some private companies which raised a decent round in good times don't have a "mark-to-market&q... till their next round.

      Over all I agree with your analysis. The management of SIRF would be looking at their past valuations and would likely awaiting return of sunny days till it does not matter any more. Look at Yahoo... I think that's because we are people in Exec are optimists otherwise they won't even get invited for an interview!!!

      LOL.

      Anil
      View article »
    • Tue Jul 15th 15:28 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Fannie and Freddie: Let’s Call the Whole Thing Off
      Sadly - This is true. Government is also engaging in deception by not nationalizing and informing tax payers of the obligations/bail outs assumed on behalf of citizens.
      View article »
    • Tue Jul 15th 15:02 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Who's to Blame for IndyMac's Failure?
      Indymac was formed because Counrywide was sort of ashamed to carry those MBS in its portfolio. The only surprise is that Countrywide folded before Indymac.

      People wake up.... Just because some one says so-an-so is poor does not mean a bank will go bankrupt.

      I can assure of any comment of those type will not affect Charles Schwab for that matter..
      View article »
    • Tue Jul 15th 11:30 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Time to Exempt Mortgage Securities from Mark-to-Market Rules
      I don't understand why they would start marking up? They own mortgage not the house. When there is risk in realizing the full amounts due due to deterioration of underlying collateral - only then they have to write down.

      They can write up only to the extent the write down is due to such down turn.

      Once the write down is over, more likely the write ups will be in line with historic averages for home price appreciations.

      Have I missed something?
      View article »
    • Fri Jul 11th 12:55 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      General Discussion on TIE
      I think buy because they have no meaningful debts or level3 assets.
      But I am a bit gun shy given the fall it has seen already. The question in my mind is what is it that I do not see but people selling/shorting see.


      On Apr 06 05:18 AM SeekingAlpha Editors wrote:

      > Is this a buy or a sell?
      View forum topic »
    • Fri Jul 11th 12:50 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Fannie and Freddie: When the GSEs Go, So Goes the Dollar
      BS Detector,

      Although your analysis is good, it may contain one small flawed assumption. "The housing value of the assets will return to previous values". While this may come true in next 10 years, the NPV of those gains vs. cost of carrying these resources may not be attractive.

      I guess it depends on what side is the bias. If we think that housing prices will return to their peak in next 3 years or so then your argument may have merit.

      What are your thoughts?
      View article »
    • Wed Jul 9th 12:26 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Chinese Bubble Bursts: Thanks for the Wild Ride
      Is this an article or a comment? It looks like the article is inadvertently truncated and the main message lost. If not, then this is a very stupid article.
      View article »
    • Tue Jul 8th 19:52 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      General Discussion on TIE
      I am long on TIE. However I noticed today that the majority of Analysts don't expect this company to do well. It appears that Institutions reduced their net position by about 20 Mil shares in just one quarter.

      However Motely Fools this is rated high. Frankly, with energy costs shooting up Ti should be in high demand in next gen Auto, Next gen planes and the entire medical ortho prosthesis are made from Ti itself.

      My conviction on this share is increasingly growing weak. What am I missing?
      View forum topic »
    • Tue Jul 8th 19:24 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      General Discussion on NBG
      Why is the NBG falling if all the fundamentals point to an improved profit? Something is amiss here.
      View forum topic »