FourBrane

comments31
  • Positive ratings 0
  • Negative ratings 0
  • Net rating 0
Filter comments by:
Highest rated Latest comments
Or filter by symbol:

Latest Comments
31 Comments

    • Sun Oct 26th 04:49 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      OPEC's Cuts Can't Fight Global Recession Headwinds
      Friday's drop in oil has to be seen in context: EVERYTHING has been dropping worldwide. Oil paid no attention to OPEC nor is it mechanically responding to supply or assumed demand destruction because the broader context is VALUE destruction. Market-wide, normal valuations (PE, etc) mean almost nothing. None of us are comfortable buying anything at any price (oil, gold, or grain) until we think we might actually have a chance to figure out the game.

      Under these conditions, oil may momentarily drop to $30 and diamonds sell for the price of glass. The craziness probably won't end until at least the Japanese carry trade has been totally unwound and probably when most hedge funds are belly up with nothing left to dump.

      The market is already pricing as though no one will ever drill for oil again. There are oil service companies selling at PEs below 2 right now. Their market values are below the fully depreciated replacement cost of their equipment...never mind other aspects of their usiness. Tellingly, even these companies can't be snapped up on the cheap because no one can borrow a dime.

      It won't last. Without exploration, the price of oil will have to climb as pumping rates slowly decline. Peak oil is real and peak world population is nowhere in site.
      View article »
    • Thu Oct 23rd 22:08 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Credit Default Swaps, Part Two: ICE and Other Exchanges
      Aside from any likely share of the CDS market, volumes handled by ICE are still going up right now as the stock's price plummets. To date, October oil futures and options volume is 10% above an average month this year, while combined U.S. commodity, FX and Russell trading is up 37%. I don't have the patience to calculate the Canadian volumes as they don't report it conveniently.
      Still, ICE is very thinly traded, so it cannot seem to get a stable price and that makes owning it (as I do) a difficult exercise in fear control. This stock bucks harder than a wild horse and many a rider has recently been thrown off.
      View article »
    • Sat Oct 18th 14:15 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Salesforce.com: Pricey and Coming Down Fast
      SalesForce.com has been lifted by the fad for cloud computing. No largish company bets its business on off-the-shelf solutions, let alone solutions hosted "somewhere." What differentiates me from my competitors when they can rent the same business system I'm using? How can I know my data is secure? Who do I call when the site's down or there's a bug?
      SalesForce is a model that might be attractive to a little company which can't afford the rupees to contract an Indian programmer and has an owner who believes pretty screens can make salesmen sell better (hah-hah-hah-hah). If they are lucky, it's a formula for "getting by," but never getting big.
      Some years ago I looked into developing on salesforce's platform, but just couldn't justify the time and effort. Not only was I going to have to originate the product, but I'd have to sell it to. If I can sell, I can host, so what did I need them for?
      I wouldn't buy this stock at $5, $2, or $1. I'll sell it all day at $30 though.
      View article »
    • Sun Oct 5th 16:41 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      World Wrestling Entertainment, Frontline: High Yield Dividend Payers
      I've held FRO for years and have no inclination to sell at any price. True, my shares are "free" since the steady dividends have paid back my entire purchase price, but that's not why I'm holding. I'm holding because time and time again I've seen John Fredrikson and his talented managers at Frontline pull profits out of a hat. These guys know more about making money in this business than anyone else in the world. Do your due diligence, folks. Read all FRO's news releases over the years and you'll be watching some masterful businessmen in action. Be sure to pay attention to alll the "extra" stuff they own (and which may get spun off to create more dividend bonanzas). I've never seen anything else like it.
      View article »
    • Fri Sep 26th 15:52 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      On Board the 'U.S.S. Titanic'
      It never ceases to amaze me that so many people, presumably interested enough in the stock market to bother reading SeekingAlpha, can be fooled by the phrase "bail out." (Yes, it is a phrase, not the ignorant coinage "bailout," by the way.)
      This is an investment. The U.S. will buy tranches of mortgages at fire sale prices which are supported underneath by actual houses sitting on actual land. Furthermore, the vast majority of these mortgages are actually current! The securitized bundles have lost value, not because we "know" how many mortgages are delinquent, but precisely because we do NOT know. This uncertainty poisons the true value. The U.S. Treasury, however, can print money which it does not have to pay back to anyone, so it can afford to hold these mortgages for five or ten or even twenty years until home prices have recovered and the financial system can re-absorb the mortgages. This is as much a "bail out" as Buffet raping Goldman-Sachs when they desperately wanted his $5 billion. There is little chance of a long-term disappearance of housing need so in just a few years this $700 billion investment in U.S. property and U.S. homeowners by the U.S. government will become a particularly profitable deal. In fact, if the U.S. Treasury later turns around and lets us buy pieces of their deal, most of us will be quite eager to buy.
      View article »
    • Thu Sep 11th 10:56 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Now's the Time To Give Your Portfolio a HERO?
      Zenfar, if the vote you refer to was the one to allow states to permit offshore drilling (which most would probably do), this would create new demand for jackup rigs, accelerating the movement of rigs out of the Gulf, and raise day rates everywhere. In short, HERO will benefit. Further, any Congressional action to promote more use of natural gas will also help HERO.
      View article »
    • Fri Aug 15th 15:17 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Forget $100 a Barrel - Oil Will Plummet to $30
      Oil drilling rigs are not "booked until 2012." There's plenty of idle capacity available right now, as anyone invested in drilling asset stocks already painfully knows. The current price of oil has not been in place long enough to give exploration companies the confidence to start investing in drilling at nearly the level needed to soak up capacity.
      View article »
    • Sun Aug 10th 15:57 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Oil vs. the Market: Major Changes Expected This Month
      mjaniec: "the recent conflict?" What a relief. I guess the war is over.
      View article »
    • Wed Aug 6th 18:02 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Crude Sell-off: Solid Entry Point into U.S. Oil Majors
      Pokeyclips2020, the water usage in tar sands extraction is not as high as you presently think. The water is recycled. The CRS Report for Congress (RS34258) dated January 17, 2008 claims that 2-3 barrels of water from the Athabaska River are needed per barrel of bitumen produced, but notes that this is before recycling. Makeup water is only .5 barrel per barrel of bitumen. (To make this clear, the first barrel of bitumen takes 2-3 barrels of water. The process loses about .5 barrel to escaped steam, etc. and thus the second barrel of bitumen needs just .5 barrels of additional "makeup" water.)
      Alberta is indeed concerned about pollution problems surrounding the extraction process and are likely to do several things, all of which will increase the production price. First on the list may be a 30% increase in royalties.
      I am long oil-related stocks, and momentarily taking a beating, but I look at the next five years and see no way for oil to remain below $150 per barrel. While I think your 300% margin requirement may be a trifle high (new side scanning techniques make drilling dry holes less likely), E&P is still an intensely risky, capital burning business and it will take oil remaining well above $100/bbl for at least a year before we see some serious new development. The oil exploration industry has to feel comfortable that the high price will still be in force 2-3 years from now when their production starts flowing before they will start shoveling money out the door to find and develop new expensive domestic resources. There are still millions of acres under contract in the Gulf of Mexico (GOM) which have not been explored, let alone drilled. Putting more unexplored acres under contract in the Atlantic or Pacific won't result in a single well being drilled until the price per barrel has stayed high for a long time and all of the GOM tracts have been drilled and are producing. The GOM comes first because flowline infrastructure already exists close to every new tract, so it's cheaper to get that oil to market.
      View article »
    • Fri Jun 27th 15:05 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Intercontinental Exchange and the New ICE Age
      Amusing, the idiot who wants to nationalize oil. The US is a net oil importer because we do not have enough of the stuff inside our own territories to supply our needs. If you nationalize oil, I'll be looking for a good printing press so I can bid on printing the ration cards.
      View article »
    • Sat Jun 14th 11:52 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Indicator Points to Higher Gas Prices - and 3 Potential Power Plays
      This article's premise that lower demand worldwide will mean increasing margins flies in the face of economic fact. Markets experiencing decreasing demand always see downward pressure on margins. Oil is not exempt from economic law and it would take four or five years of reduced oil prices to lull the consumers back into buying Hummers and other guzzlers. Meanwhile, deepwater drilling, oil sands extraction, biofuels, etc. come at HUGE cost increases, so where would that leave supply?
      When crack spreads widen it won't be because of falling demand; it will be solely due to internal industry pressure--you just can't keep producing for peanuts and maintain your equipment properly. So, at some point next year, expect to see spreads widen modestly on their own.
      View article »
    • Tue Jun 10th 16:57 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Sigma Designs Should Fall on Lost Blu-ray Customer
      This is Baird's second full-bore attack on Sigma. The stock is already in take-over range, so they need to close their short position and move on. Even with this new attack, they haven't been able to do more than squeeze another three bits out of the stock. I'm a buyer at these levels as there's nowhere to go but up.
      Most of these losses should really be thought of as second-sourcing arrangements which are to be expected as Blu-ray makers scramble to ramp volume. As to consensus, they have always been wrong on this stock. Never close, even once. (Sigma needs to hire someone who can handle a conference call and knows how to drop hints to help these incredibly stupid analysts look better. Hell hath no fury like an analyst with egg on his face.)
      At this PE for a company with products in several growth markets, there just is no short case to be made.
      View article »
    • Mon Jun 9th 12:20 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      An Oil-Driven Paradigm Shift?
      The comments found here are a representative cross section of the idea spectrum, running from right wing drill anywhere and to hell with the damn land people to back to moccasins and bone needles conservationists to the dreaming Polyannas who are certain that Amenrican Inventiveness can cure anything. Three blind men discussing the elephant, each describing their particular guess on what it looks like based on trunk, leg and tail.
      Sadly, I doubt that there is a easy way out of this one because the elephant in the room is over-population. Demand for oil, food, water, and every other resource is now or will shortly be approaching asymptote.
      Buy oil, natgas, uranium, other metals, water rights...and guns.
      View article »
    • Thu Jun 5th 08:49 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Recent Stock Performance Based on Analyst Ratings
      In my experience, analysts upgrade/downgrades typically follow the market rather than lead it. The stock has gone up, causing people on the sidelines to start thinking, "Maybe I should..." Then the analyst recommendation hits and some of those wallflowers decide to dance. The same process happens in reverse with nervous holders wondering if they should sell, then deciding.
      It's hardly worth paying attention to since the total difference between worst and best performing analyst deciles appears to be less than 5% and this small difference when the analysts are not even "predicting,"... they "postdicting.&quo...
      View article »
    • Wed Jun 4th 20:14 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Fuel Check
      It is amusing to read stories today using "plumeted" to reference a drop of $2 and change. As for inventories, they may fall for lots of reasons...oil refiners may decide to draw down in hopes they can replace stocks later more cheaply, or, bad weather or other difficulties delay offloading tankers, or, a key supplier decided to fill an order to China ahead of our guys.
      I think Jangchup has it right. It's some intermediate profit taking.
      Bespoke's charts show us just what we would expect as a commodity becomes hugely more expensive: processors stop storing tons of it. Very few jewelers can afford to keep thousands of pounds of gold laying around waiting for use, but if gold were as cheap as bricks you'd see towering stacks of the stuff in the jeweler's back yard...for convenience. Same with refiners. They pay attention to dollar inventory turns llike anyone else. To fill a tank farm now takes twice as much money. Only a fool would keep up the old habits of filling all his tanks to the max.
      View article »